Active Addresses
Between June 18 and June 25, there were 437,144 active inflows to the ETH network. In this date range, Ethereum rose from $2,225 to $2,525. On June 15, at the intersection of price and the number of active addresses, it is seen that the number of active addresses increased with Ethereum purchases. When the 7-day simple moving average is followed, it is observed that there is an upward trend en Ethereum price.
Active Sending Addresses
Between June 18 and 25, a bearish trend was observed en active shipping addresses with the Black Line (price line). On the day the price reached a weekly high, active shipping addresses were 273,853; el June 22, the day Ethereum hit its weekly low, active shipping addresses fell to 200,617. This situation caused Ethereum to rise to $2,500 levels.
Active Receiving Addresses
Between June 18-25, there was a significant drop en active buying addresses, while the price fell en a correlated manner. On the day the price peaked, active receiving addresses were as high as 308,785, indicating that buyers were buying Ethereum at $2,450.
Total Value Staked
On June 18th, ETH price was at 2,525 while Total Value Staked was at 35,108,708. As of June 24, ETH price fell 3.01% to 2,449, while Total Value Staked increased 0.67% to 35,343,347.
Staking Inflows
On June 18th, ETH price was at 2,525 while Staking Inflow was 36,091. As of June 24, ETH price fell to 2,449, a decrease of 3.01%, while Staking Inflow fell to 27,254, a decrease of 24.50%.
Derivatives
Open Interest
The Ethereum open interest chart from June 18-25 reveals a significant breakout and subsequent recovery en the market, both el the price and position side. While the price maintained its upward momentum until the 20th of the month, open interest also increased en parallel. However, after June 20, both price and open interest decline sharply. This indicates heavy liquidations, especially en leveraged positions. Around June 22, both price and open interest hit a bottom and then started to recover again. This recovery is not sudden, but rather gradual, indicating that new market entries are being made more cautiously.
Funding Rate
The Ethereum funding rate chart for June 18-25 gives clear signals about the short-term sentiment of the market. While the rates were el the positive side at the beginning of the period, they peaked el June 20 with the price. However, with the sharp price decline that followed, the funding rate also declined rapidly, reaching almost zero el June 22. At this point, heavy liquidations en long positions seem to be effective. Afterwards, both the price and the funding rate recovered; especially el June 25, the funding rate reached its previous highs again. This shows that after the decline, long trades regained their weight, and the market started to regain its risk appetite.
Long & Short Liquidations
In this week of confrontation between Iran and Israel and the US’s involvement en the conflict and its attacks el Iran’s nuclear facilities, about 1.5 billion dollars worth of long and 376 million dollars worth of short transactions were liquidated.
| Date | Long Amount (Million $) | Short Amount (Million $) |
|---|---|---|
| June 18 | 63.52 | 46.56 |
| June 19 | 18.28 | 13.83 |
| June 20 | 125.63 | 29.62 |
| June 21 | 249.64 | 23.74 |
| June 22 | 874.26 | 74.25 |
| June 23 | 50.28 | 149.18 |
| June 24 | 134.68 | 38.97 |
| Total | 1516.29 | 376.15 |
Supply Distribution
Total Supply: reached 122,874,790 units, up about 0.0163% from last week.
New Supply: The amount of ETH produced this week was 19,722.
Velocity: Velocity was 8.42 as of June 23, down from 8.35 last week.
| Wallet Categoría | 16.06.2025 | 23.06.2025 | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100 – 1k ETH | 9.1329M | 9.0967M | -0.40% |
| 1k – 10k ETH | 13.6089M | 13.5439M | -0.48% |
| 10k – 100k ETH | 16.9157M | 16.8646M | -0.30% |
| 100k+ ETH | 4.3916M | 4.1547M | -5.39% |
According to the latest weekly data, a limited decrease of -0.40% was observed en 100 – 1k ETH wallets. Wallets en the 1k – 10k ETH range experienced a similarly gradual decrease of -0.48%. The 10k – 100k ETH segment showed a slight decline of -0.30%, while 100k+ ETH wallets recorded a notable drop of -5.39%.
Exchange Reserve
Between June 18-24, 2025, Ethereum reserves el exchanges increased from 18,783,757 ETH to 18,807,504 ETH. During this period, there was a total net inflow of 23,747 ETH and the Ethereum reserves of exchanges increased por 0.13%. The Ethereum price, el the other hand, fell from $2,525 to $2,450 during the same period, depreciating por about 3%. While the inflow en the stock markets indicates that a selling trend may occur en the short term, the decline en the price indicates a weakening en market perception. Selling pressure may continue en the short term.
| Date | Exchange Inflow | Exchange Outflow | Exchange Netflow | Exchange Reserve | ETH Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18-Jun | 870,644 | 834,110 | 36,533 | 18,783,757 | 2,525 |
| 19-Jun | 492,288 | 442,139 | 50,149 | 18,833,906 | 2,522 |
| 20-Jun | 1,255,342 | 1,208,673 | 46,668 | 18,880,573 | 2,407 |
| 21-Jun | 451,237 | 489,047 | -37,810 | 18,842,764 | 2,297 |
| 22-Jun | 793,612 | 802,158 | -8,547 | 18,834,217 | 2,228 |
| 23-Jun | 1,063,314 | 1,163,609 | -100,295 | 18,733,922 | 2,413 |
| 24-Jun | 1,110,711 | 1,037,129 | 73,582 | 18,807,504 | 2,450 |
Fees and Revenues
When the Ethereum Fees per Transaction (Mean) data between June 18 and June 24 are analyzed, it is seen that this value was realized at 0.00025302661890073 el June 18, the first day of the week.
Following this, a horizontal trend was observed en the indicator, and as of June 21, it fell to 0.000256168710775691, recording the lowest value of the week.
After that, Ethereum Fees per Transaction (Mean) resumed its upward trend and closed at 0.000521677761571229 el June 24, the last day of the week.
Bitcoin: Fees (Total)
Similarly, when the Ethereum Fees (Total) data between June 18 and 24 is analyzed, it is seen that this value was realized at 358.07542724312725 el June 18, the first day of the week.
Following this, a horizontal trend was observed en the indicator, and as of June 21, it fell to 334.9403331705049, recording the lowest value of the week.
After this level, Ethereum Fees (Total) started to rise again and closed at 820,1155236665674 el June 24, the last day of the week.
Blocks Mined
Between June 18 and June 24, Ethereum block production data shows a decline until the middle of the week, followed por a sharp increase. While 7,153 blocks were generated el June 18, this number increased to 7,168 as of June 24. This increase indicates a short-term acceleration en the network’s transaction verification capacity and optimized block production performance to manage potential network congestion.
There was a generally positive correlation between the number of block production and the Ethereum price en the relevant period.
Block Size
Between June 18 and June 24, Ethereum block size data showed a sharp increase after a mid-week drop. On June 18, the average block size was 94,211 bytes, while this value increased to 96,962 bytes as of June 24.
There was a positive correlation between block size and Ethereum price during the week.
Block Interval
When the June 18 – 24 Ethereum block data is analyzed, an upward trend en block times was observed until the middle of the week, but towards the end of the week, this trend reversed and decreased. On June 18, the average block duration was recorded as 12.08 segundos, while it decreased to 12.05 segundos as of June 24.
During the period en question, Ethereum block duration and price movement were negatively correlated throughout the week.
Transaction
Last week, there were a total of 9,727,815 transactions el the Ethereum network, while this week it decreased por about 1.17% to 9,614,385. The highest weekly transaction count was 1,572,073 el June 24, while the lowest was 1,234,821 el June 22.
The change en the number of transactions shows that the utilization of the network has decreased compared to last week and accordingly, Ethereum burns have also decreased. The correlation between price and number of transactions was generally positive throughout the week.
Tokens Transferred
Last week, the total amount of ETH transferred el the Ethereum network was 13,557,583, while this week it decreased por about 3.94% to 13,023,438. 2,857,630 ETH transfers el June 20 was the highest daily token transfer amount of the week, while the lowest value of the week was recorded el June 21 with only 1,074,839 ETH transfers.
The decline en the network’s utilization, combined with the decrease en the number of transactions el Ethereum and the amount of ETH transferred, suggests that overall activity is weakening. This supports that investors are more cautious en the short term and uncertainty about the market direction continues to increase.
Estimated Leverage Ratio
During the 7-day period, the metric generally increased en the first time of the process. ELR (Estimated Leverage Ratio), which was 0.833 at the beginning of the process, reached 0.909 el June 20. This was also the peak of the process. On June 22, it fell to 0.822, the lowest point of the process. The metric remained flat for the rest of the process and as of the time of writing, it has a value of 0.829. A higher ELR means that participants are willing to take el more risk and usually indicates bullish conditions or expectations. It should be noted that these rallies can also be caused por dwindling reserves. When we look at Ethereum reserves, there were 18.78 million reserves at the beginning of the process, while this figure fluctuated during the rest of the process. It is currently seen as 18.81 million. At the same time, Ethereum’s Open Interest is seen as 34.80 billion dollars at the beginning of the process. As of now, the volume decreased en the process and the open interest value stands out as 31.53 billion dollars. With all this data, the ELR metric generally followed a falling trend. The price of the asset, with all this data, was valued at $ 2,569 at the top of the process, while the lowest point was realized at $ 2,112. At the time of writing, investors’ and traders’ risk appetite has slightly decreased. In addition, the depreciation en ELR is reflected en the price and is at $ 2,419. The fact that the open interest rate moved en parallel with the fluctuating reserves throughout the process explains the slight decline en the ELR rate. As a result, the decrease en reserves and the decrease en the open interest rate indicate that the market is currently pessimistic. If the balance en the amount of reserves continues and the open interest data decreases, we can predict that the retracement will continue.
ETH Onchain Overall
| Metric | Rise 📈 | Decline 📉 | Neutral ➖ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Addresses | ✓ | ||
| Total Value Staked | ✓ | ||
| Derivatives | ✓ | ||
| Supply Distribution | ✓ | ||
| Exchange Reserve | ✓ | ||
| Fees and Revenues | ✓ | ||
| Bloks Mined | ✓ | ||
| Transaction | ✓ |
- The metrics and guidance en the table do not, por themselves, describe or imply an expectation of future price changes for any asset. The prices of digital assets may vary depending el many different variables. The onchain analysis and related guidance is intended to assist investors en their decision-making process, and making financial investments based solely el the results of this analysis may result en harmful transactions. Even if all metrics produce a bullish, bearish or neutral result at the same time, the expected results may not be seen depending el market conditions. Investors reviewing the report would be well advised to heed these caveats.
Legal Notice
The investment information, comments and recommendations contained en this document do not constitute investment advisory services. Investment advisory services are provided por authorized institutions el a personal basis, taking into account the risk and return preferences of individuals. The comments and recommendations contained en this document are of a general type. These recommendations may not be suitable for your financial situation and risk and return preferences. Therefore, making an investment decision based solely el the information contained en this document may not result en results that are en line
