The assets that stood out in this divergence were Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Binance Coin (BNB), Solana (SOL), TRON (TRX), and Golem (GLM). These cryptocurrencies attracted attention due to their solid foundations in terms of both technical infrastructure and market liquidity. During the decline, the price ranges of these six projects remained more controlled despite the panic observed across the market.
Cryptocurrency Price Comparisons
The table below shows the highest and lowest prices of each cryptocurrency on October 10, 2025, and the percentage difference between these values. This difference reflects the price’s intraday fluctuation range and volatility level.
| Cryptocurrency | Highest ($) | Lowest ($) | Difference (Highest > Lowest) |
|---|---|---|---|
| BTC | 122,550 | 102,000 | 16.78% |
| ETH | 4,393 | 3,435 | 21.82% |
| BNB | 1,278 | 860.11 | 32.71% |
| SOL | 224.46 | 168.79 | 24.81% |
| TRX | 0.3372 | 0.3000 | 11.03% |
| GLM | 0.22099 | 0.14584 | 34.00% |
As seen in the table, TRX has been the cryptocurrency with the lowest volatility. The stable transaction volume on the TRON network, regular token burns, and on-chain revenue flow have ensured that TRX lost relatively less value during the downturn. Bitcoin (BTC) maintained its status as the market’s reserve asset, showing limited fluctuation with a difference of 16.78%. In contrast, BNB and GLM were among the most volatile cryptocurrencies on the list, with a change rate of over 30%. However, this volatility is due to liquidity conversion rather than panic selling.
Key Factors Behind the Resilience of TRX and BTC
TRX has demonstrated strong on-chain activity throughout 2025. The total amount burned on the network has progressed in parallel with the transaction volume, creating a supply contraction. TRON’s network revenue model is supported by USDT transactions and stablecoin transfer volumes. This mechanism provides TRX with a natural demand base. Therefore, while the market experienced sharp sell-offs, the TRX price did not fall below the $0.30 level. This demonstrates investors’ fundamental confidence in the project.
Bitcoin fell from $122,550 to $102,000 on the same day, but this decline was not as deep as that seen in other altcoins. BTC’s institutional ownership, the presence of ETF-based inflows, and its limited supply structure have made it easier for the price to find support. The preservation of the $100,000 psychological level during the decline proves that Bitcoin still functions as the market’s safe haven. This resistance strengthens expectations that it will maintain its leadership in the new cycle.
ETH, BNB, SOL, and GLM’s Divergence Dynamics
ETH has been able to limit volatility thanks to high DeFi interaction and intense activity on Layer-2 networks. Falling from its peak of $4,393 to $3,435, ETH has remained below the market average by 21.82%. This decline rate indicates that Ethereum maintains its position as a fundamental asset in the eyes of both institutional and individual investors.
On the BNB side, the fluctuation rate was calculated at 32.71%. This rate is linked to the unwinding of high-leverage trades on the exchange, despite high usage intensity within the ecosystem. BNB’s decline is interpreted as a temporary liquidity crunch.
SOL has retreated from its peak of $224.46 to $168.79. This represents a difference of approximately 24.8%. However, the number of transactions on the Solana network remained high even during the decline. This demonstrates the strength of the ecosystem’s active user base.
GLM, despite its relatively small market capitalization, has shown a notable divergence. Although GLM’s 34% price difference, falling from $0.22099 to $0.14584, appears high, this is explained by the token’s distinct liquidity profile. GLM’s price pullback occurred with limited volume and did not turn into a panic sell-off. The network’s structure, based on artificial intelligence and computing power sharing, continues to generate project-specific demand.
Conclusion
The sharp sell-offs on October 10, 2025, starkly highlighted the difference between projects with weak fundamentals and cryptocurrencies with solid infrastructure. TRX, BTC, ETH, BNB, SOL, and GLM became symbols of resilience with their performance during this period. In particular, TRX’s ability to remain within an 11% narrow band indicates the strength of the project’s fundamentals.
The common thread among these six cryptocurrencies is their ability to maintain investor confidence, sustain network activity, and keep liquidity flowing during market crashes. These characteristics suggest the potential for their price performance to exceed the average in the new cycle.
Historical trends observed in market cycles show that assets that survive downturns tend to play a leading role in the subsequent expansion phase. Therefore, these tokens that showed resilience on October 10 may not only be winners in the current market conditions but also harbingers of a new uptrend. In particular, the structure of Bitcoin and Ethereum, supported by institutional participation, and TRON’s deflationary token burn policy lay the groundwork for long-term value appreciation.
Additionally, ongoing developments in the technological infrastructure of projects with innovative networks, such as GLM and SOL, support continued investor interest. BNB’s ecosystem-internal usage and continuous supply reduction reinforce the economic resilience of the BSC network. When all these elements are combined, it is concluded that these six cryptocurrencies, which stood out in the October 10 correction, are poised to play a leading role in the next cycle in terms of both technical and behavioral indicators.
In conclusion, the October 10, 2025, decline is not merely a short-term volatility wave but a stress test revealing which projects the crypto ecosystem truly trusts. The resilience demonstrated by TRX, ETH, BNB, SOL, GLM, and BTC once again highlights the importance of fundamental sustainability in long-term investment strategies. Therefore, it is anticipated that these robust projects will form the foundation of the new market cycle.
Disclaimer
This report is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency investments involve high volatility and risk of capital loss. Readers should conduct their own research or consult financial advisors before making investment decisions. Darkex assumes no liability for losses arising from reliance on this content.
